This libtard Nadeem Farooq Paracha, inadvertently, did us a great favor and destroyed the entire argument of the liberal secular beyghairats against Two Nation Ideology.
This libtard Nadeem Farooq Paracha, inadvertently, did us a great favor and destroyed the entire argument of the liberal secular beyghairats against Two Nation Ideology.
In his article, he has finally accepted all OUR arguments...:)
that
Two nation ideology is real.
Even Hindus accept it, in fact, started to speak on it earlier than Muslims.
Quaid and Muslims adopted it before creation of Pakistan and this is the real ideology upon which Pakistan is created.
Marvi sermed, RIP.....:))
#historylesson
Did you know that the Two Nation Theory was first proposed and developed by hindus?
This is how it happened. In the late 19th century, Nabagopal Mitra, one of the pioneers of Hindu nationalism, authored a paper in which he described the Hindus of India as a nation that was better than the Muslims and the Christians. He added that ‘the basis of national unity in India was the Hindu religion’ and that the Hindus should strive to form an ‘Aryan nation.’
In an early 20th century pamphlet, Bhai Paramanand, a leading member of the Hindu reformist movement the Arya Samaj, described the Hindus and Muslims as being two separate nations who were ‘irreconcilable.’ In his autobiography, ‘My Life’, Pramanand mentions how in 1908 he called for an exchange and settling of Hindu and Muslim populations in different geographical areas.
In a December 14, 1924 article in the Bombay daily, The Tribune, Congress leader and Hindu nationalist Lajpat Rai too called for a ‘clear partition of the region into a Hindu India and non-Hindu India …’
In 1923, poet and playwright, VD Savarkar, coined the word, ‘Hindutva’ in a book (also titled Hindutva). He coined the word to mean ‘Hinduness’ and wrote that the Muslims (and the Christians) of India were outside of ‘Hindu nationhood.’ Then, in 1937 while speaking at the 19th session of the influential Hindu Mahasabha, Savarkar insisted ‘there are two nations in India: Hindus and the Muslims.’
In 1939, MS Golwalker — the supreme leader of the radical Hindu organisation the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) — published his book, ‘We, Or Our Nationhood Defined’. In it he asserted that the minority communities of India (specifically, Muslim) should merge with the Hindu nation or perish. He wrote that non-Hindus in India could not be considered Indian unless they were ‘purified’ (i.e. converted to Hinduism).
Golwalker described the Hindus as being India’s ‘national race’ and pointed at the example of Nazi Germany’s eradication of the Jews as a way to deal with minorities who refused to adapt to the culture of the national race.
Interestingly, during the recent rise in the attacks against Muslims in India, the country’s PM and the chief of the BJP, Narendra Modi, suggested that India’s Muslims should not be rebuked but need ‘purification’ (parishkar). Modi was referring to the use of this word in this context by BJP’s prime ideologue, Pandit Upadhyaya. Upadhyaya had first used the word decades ago as an extension of the Sanskrit word Shuddi used by Hindu nationalist Dr. PS Moonje in 1923. Shuddi also means ‘purification’ and Moonje had used it to mean the conversion of Muslims and Christians to Hinduism.
Indian academic and historian Dr. Shamsul Islam has extensively quoted speeches, articles and pamphlets of various Hindu nationalists in his 2015 book Revisiting the legacy of Allah Bakhsh, to establish the fact that, indeed, the communal impulse and justification of India’s partition (into two separate nations) was originally formed by Hindu nationalists and was adopted much later by the likes of Jinnah. And as mentioned earlier, Jinnah adopted it in 1940 for the Muslims after fearing that Indian nationalism had come to mean Hindu nationalism.
Excerpted from: Smokers' Corner: Whose Two-Nation Theory is it Anyway by Nadeem Farooq Paracha...................FACEBOOK POST..
https://www.facebook.com/syedzaidzamanhamid/posts/1463618710359602
10 years ago, we used the terms 4th Generation War and later 5th Generation War...But Pakistan army & ISI listened to us carefully.....
https://www.facebook.com/syedzaidzamanhamid/videos/1463664287021711/
10 years ago, we used the terms 4th Generation War and later 5th Generation War...
Every enemy, every idiot, every rascal made fun of us....every snake created doubts and called us "conspiracy theorist" ...
But Pakistan army & ISI listened to us carefully.....they studied what we told and then officially recognized that a new war doctrine of 4th and 5th Generation wars is now deployed against Pakistan...Alhamdolillah, Pakistan was saved because we gave our azaan in time to warn our armed forces.....
Today, every analyst, every anchor is talking about 4th and 5th generation wars....alhamdolillah...
Thats why we say, when we say something which you dont understand, dont start screaming like idiots...there is khair in trusting us.....those who matter, listen to us very carefully.......
https://www.facebook.com/syedzaidzamanhamid/videos/1463664287021711/
https://www.facebook.com/commerce/products/1094053224011713/?hc_ref=ARQctGb6Vxeq-1jHeO6B1Bryl5s-jQcCGmDgfEMavnXy7DH-J0uPLYNCFRsak76yMpE
https://www.facebook.com/syedzaidzamanhamid/posts/1463676623687144
